Emerging advances in synthetic biology and gene editing are revolutionising global plant science sectors, offering potential solutions to challenges in sustainable resource use, agricultural production, and climate change. However, since the first generation of genetically modified crops, biotechnological innovations have faced enduring criticism, and the complex interplay between the advantages and real-world challenges of agricultural biotechnology continues to drive debate within the scientific community, policy circles, and the broader public.
Novel genetic interventions present innovative solutions to diverse challenges but also represent new kinds of risks and concerns. Given the historical significance of earlier genetic technologies, it is crucial to understand how different communicative mechanisms shape public perceptions, political discussion, media representation, and decision-making, and thus influence the innovation process.
Framing theory can be used to investigate the impact representations of biotechnology have in defining problems, justifying interventions, and speculating about the future of agriculture and food systems. By shifting the research focus from the polarisation between proponents and opponents of biotechnology to the dynamics between actors and the underlying assumptions that underpin the development of these technologies, we gain valuable insights into the science community's role in shaping public understanding throughout the scientific process and its significance in navigating these complex problems.
In exploring how transdisciplinary approaches can help drive better outcomes in the innovation process, I ask the following question: Can understanding the meanings we attach to agricultural biotechnology foster innovation that is not only scientifically robust but also socially responsible?